Americans are wailing what Dr. Peková revealed to the world about the origin of coronavirus

The Czech molecular biologist explained in detail why she is of the opinion that Coronavirus originated in the laboratory, but in the USA a crack broke out to such an extent that a text appeared on the Nature Medicine server that tries to refute the claim with the reference that it is a natural mutation ! At the beginning of the analysis there is a full refutation, but at the end there is only talk of low plausibility and the need to collect more data about how it really is! MUDr. Soňa Peková revealed too uncomfortable the truth and explained to ordinary people in the video things that were supposed to remain permanently forbidden to the general public!

Czech molecular biologist and head of Tilia Laboratories MUDr. Soňa Peková has literally become a Czech national celebrity and star in the last few days, not only because her laboratory was the first in the Czech Republic to test one of the first cases infected with Coronavir and not only because it developed a new and cheap method to test this virus. Her interview for the Slovak news television TA3 aroused the greatest interest, where she openly talked about the origin of the Sars-Cov-2 virus and explained in detail and in layman's terms why she thinks Coronavirus originated in the laboratory and not by a natural natural mutation somewhere in animals in nature. It is not often that a top biologist is able to explain to ordinary lay people how to recognize that one virus comes from a laboratory and another does not.

MUDr. Soňa Peková during an interview in the laboratory.

In an interview with Dr. Peková explained that viruses generally consist of RNA strands that tend to mutate, change, merge, and alter, especially in those regions of RNA that take care of protein production. Thus, changes in this region of RNA are so dynamic that the influence of nature is natural and mutations originating from natural cycles are the most common form of mutations.  However, every virus and every RNA in it has something called a "control room," a control site that controls mutations in the rest of the RNA. This region of RNA at the very beginning of the helix could be compared to some kind of boot sector on a computer disk from which the operating system itself boots. Basically, it can be thought of as a BIOS interface. And when biologists look at this stretch of RNA, something just doesn't play at once.

The Coronavir RNA Control Center looks like someone turned it upside down, and it all worked perfectly.

As MUDr. Soňa Peková, from the biologist's point of view, it looks as if, figuratively speaking, someone broke into the headquarters of this RNA control room, turned it all upside down, threw out all the cabinets and drawers, in such a way that it is very difficult to believe that on the one hand, this process originated by chance in nature, and at the same time, on the other hand, that this chaotic and random process would not be killed by the virus.

The RNA control room itself is the main point of control of mutations in the rest of the RNA, and in this case it would mean believing that in nature the loader and control room of the virus were overwritten to complete perfection without compromising the function of the virus. And that is why Dr. Peková believes that Coronavirus could have originated in the laboratory, because such fundamental changes in the RNA control room of this virus would practically not have occurred naturally in the case without it eliminating the virus.

Dr. Peková shows the RNA regulatory region of Coronavir, where the so-called control room is located.

MUDr. In the interview, Soňa Peková explained in such a comprehensible way that the RNA virus works that it caused dismay in certain places. Her explanation of what had happened in the RNA control room of the virus crossed that line of separation of incomprehensible information from the general public. She explained to the audience that the Sars-Cov-2 RNA control room had undergone massive gene changes and transcripts, insertions (deletions of sequences), deletions (deletions of sequences) and other complex changes in such large quantities that, if done by nature, completely chaotic and random, the virus would simply die because it could not work and be in order.

And when a molecular biologist explains to ordinary people in such a comprehensible way how it works, there is a huge roar, noise and intense "damage control" elsewhere with the sole aim of denying this information and pretending to be a natural, albeit unusual, natural one. mutation without any intervention by humans and their laboratories. And that is exactly what happened, the US government issued an order and ordered US scientists to deny this information, both the information of Dr. Pek as well as similarly tuned statements of Chinese scientists.

US government urges scientists to write counter-analysis refuting Chinese allegations, but also statements by Czech molecular biologist

Two days ago, the American server Nature published an analysis [ 1 ] in the Medicine section , which is more similar to crisis management, the aim of which is to refute all information that Coronavirus originated in the laboratory. The paradox is that Dr. herself In an interview for TA3, Peková refers to a laboratory in Wuhan, that is the well-known National Reference Laboratory in Wuhan, she does not talk about American laboratories anywhere, but paradoxically it is not China that needs to refute something about this theory, it is American scientists who there is in the role of the so-called needy goose.

The analysis itself is full of scientific and biological phrases and information about the genome, which probably won't tell us much, but I will only point out the introduction and end of this text from the document itself. As it turns out, this is not a comprehensive scientific study, but rather a political proclamation to protect the US that US laboratories are not behind Coronavir's gene manipulation. The article on Nature Medicine itself is called  The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 and in its introduction completely excludes the laboratory origin of Coronavir. At the beginning of the analysis it is written:

Since the first reports of new cases of pneumonia (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, there has been considerable discussion about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 (also known as HCoV-19). SARS-CoV-2 infections are now widespread, and since 11 March 2020, 121,564 cases with 4,373 deaths have been confirmed in more than 110 countries.

SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans; SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can cause serious illness, while HKU1, NL63, OC43 and 229E are associated with mild symptoms. Here is an overview of what can be deduced about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 from a comparative analysis of genomic data. We offer an insight into the remarkable features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and discuss the scenarios under which they might arise. Our analyzes clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a deliberately manipulated virus.

Right at the beginning of this analysis, it is declared at the end of the second paragraph that Coronavirus does not come from a laboratory. The analysis itself is followed by various arguments, there is also a graph, but at the end of this analysis there is a strange change and propositional shift in statements that are much more cautious and not as authoritative as the statement at the beginning of the analysis, judge for yourself. At the end of the analysis, the authors state:

The genomic features described herein may partially explain the infectivity and transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 in humans. Although evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not a deliberately engineered virus, it is currently impossible to demonstrate or refute other theories of its origin described herein. However, because we have observed all significant features of SARS-CoV-2, including the optimized RBD site and polybasic cleavage in related coronaviruses in nature, we do not believe that any type of laboratory scenario is plausible.

More scientific data could change the balance of evidence and favor one hypothesis over another. Obtaining related viral sequences from animal sources would be the most accurate way to detect viral origins. For example, future observations of an intermediate or fully formed polybasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 virus from animals would further support natural selection hypotheses. It would also be useful to obtain more genetic and functional data on SARS-CoV-2, including animal studies.

First a denial of theory and then a statement about mere unreliability. However, the US military is clear that it is fleeing the virus from Europe and there will be no Defender 2020 exercise!

Well that's a surprise. So from the categorical statement in the second paragraph at the beginning of the analysis that the analyzes show that Coronavirus is not a laboratory construct, we came to the conclusion that it is currently impossible to prove or refute the described theories of Coronavirus origin and that the theory is only "Unbelievable". And it's very clear to me why American scientists have done this. They want to keep the door open for the future, in case it breaks and the truth is open to the public. Scientists do not want to risk discrediting themselves as part of a political campaign and damage control management by the US government, to which information is beginning to leak and China accuses the US through its ministry spokesperson that US troops dragged Coronavirus into China last October during World Military Games that took place in Wuhan.

Laboratory workplace Dr. Pekové.

Once again, one crucial thing needs to be mentioned. The US military has de facto canceled and unofficially canceled [ 2 ] Europe's largest NATO exercise since the end of the Cold War, called Defender 2020. The reason for canceling the exercise is the Covid-19 plague, which is rampant in Europe. However, this is a completely unprecedented step, because in Europe there is already part of the shifted American technology, and even part of the American soldiers. Everything was ready and suddenly over. While in the past there were epidemics in the world of SARS, MERS, all possible bird and swine flu, the US military did not interrupt any operations and major exercises. So why is Coronavir suddenly stopping the largest NATO exercise in Europe in 30 years?

Question per million: Did the Americans bring a biological weapon to Wuhan last October, which mutated and instead of just Chinese men, it attacks everyone and, as it turns out, especially Europeans?

The reason is obvious, the American general seems to know very well what Coronavirus is and where it comes from, where this virus was created. If the Pentagon never does anything, it's exposing its own military to the effects of its own biological weapons. And just Coronavirus, according to all information, not only according to the opinions of MUDr. Soni Pek, and not just according to the Chinese government, really comes from a laboratory program, and we can speculate that it may also be a program of biological weapons of the US military, respectively. US Navy. It all fits together logically and perfectly. In October 2019, the World Military Games are held in Wuhan, with the participation of the American military delegation of athletes. An epidemic of Coronavir occurs in Wuhan in December. European allies of the USA are calm, European media claim that the virus was caused due to poor hygiene and insufficient heat treatment of Chinese traditional food sold on the streets in stalls.

Computer virus analysis.

In just two months, the disease reaches Italy in Europe, and the Czech government, in its naivete, declares that it will not check tourists returning by car from a holiday in Italy at the southern border. Another month later, the whole of Europe is in crisis, emergencies are being declared, quarantines, people have to wear veils that are not available, people sew their own from sheets, old T-shirts, bathrobes, tablecloths.

And in the light of this contagion, NATO is canceling the largest military exercise since 1989. If nothing else, NATO has just shown its weakness to Russia, that it is enough to spread the virus in Europe and NATO is completely shut down. I can imagine that many hawks in NATO did not agree with the abolition of the Defender 2020 exercise, but the Americans clearly know what they are doing. And it also sends a signal that the Russian threat will not be so great when the exercise is destroyed by one virus. But it is also necessary to look at it from another side, and that is also important.

Can the more serious flu ruin NATO's greatest military maneuvers since 1989 in Europe? He can't! And can a virus from laboratory research do that? Obviously yes…

The cancellation of the Defender 2020 exercise is also probably an attempt to prevent embarrassment if it turns out that some NATO countries refuse to participate in the exercise due to a viral threat. And that would send a signal of NATO disunity, fear of a virus outbreak, etc. The Pentagon's decision was certainly not easy, as according to the latest information, 9,000 US troops are already deployed in Europe out of a total of 20,000 to move to Europe in the near future. and with them is a technology shifted in Europe that is now beginning to return to the United States.

Work in a laboratory protective box.

Instead of Defender 2020, a smaller routine exercise of artillery, armored vehicles and aircraft will take place in the Baltics, but to a limited extent and format. After the great pan-European maneuvers of all NATO armies, there is suddenly no memory. And all because of the virus, whose origin is paradoxically, according to American scientists, still unclear and inconclusive from the analysis. It's a comedy, my goodness. When China openly accuses the US of pulling the virus into Wuhan, it is a matter of course. It's not slapping in the wind. And so does the confession [ 3] CDC chief Robert Redfield that people in the United States were dying of Coronavirus at a time when no one in the United States knew about Coronavirus, and that death was originally attributed to the flu and only recently revealed from the dead samples that they died of Coronavirus context. Czech biologist Dr. Peková may have revealed more to the world than she may have guessed. And a big thank you for that.